A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals

By G. Singh, A. Cisneros‐Montemayor, W. Swartz, William W. L. Cheung, J. Guy, T. Kenny, Chris McOwen, R. Asch, J. Geffert, C. Wabnitz and 3 more. Marine Policy, 2017

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Achieving the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) results in many ecological, social, and economic consequences that are inter-related. Understanding relationships between sustainability goals and determining their interactions can help prioritize effective and efficient policy options. This paper presents a framework that integrates existing knowledge from literature and expert opinions to rapidly assess the relationships between one SDG goal and another. Specifically, given the important role of the oceans in the world's social-ecological systems, this study focuses on how SDG 14 (Life Below Water), and the targets within that goal, contributes to other SDG goals. This framework differentiates relationships based on compatibility (co-benefit, trade-off, neutral), the optional nature of achieving one goal in attaining another, and whether these relationships are context dependent. The results from applying this framework indicate that oceans SDG targets are related to all other SDG goals, with two ocean targets (of seven in total) most related across all other SDG goals. Firstly, the ocean SDG target to increase economic benefits to Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and least developed countries for sustainable marine uses has positive relationships across all SDGs. Secondly, the ocean SDG target to eliminate overfishing, illegal and destructive fishing practices is a necessary pre-condition for achieving the largest number of other SDG targets. This study highlights the importance of the oceans in achieving sustainable development. The rapid assessment framework can be applied to other SDGs to comprehensively map out the subset of targets that are also pivotal in achieving sustainable development.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2222072eccbd7a6dd7503494b782f8d2f9c7c088

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Wwl Cheung
  2. J. Emmett Duffy
  3. Elizabeth A. Fulton
  4. R. Watson
  5. G. Pecl
  6. E. Milner‐Gulland
  7. R. Naidoo
  8. Henrique M. Pereira

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Wwl Cheung
  2. Elizabeth A. Fulton
  3. R. Watson
  4. J. Emmett Duffy
  5. Mark John Costello
  6. G. Pecl
  7. E. Milner‐Gulland
  8. R. Naidoo

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. E. Milner‐Gulland
  2. R. Naidoo
  3. L. Fonseca
  4. J. Emmett Duffy
  5. Kai Ma Chan
  6. Josef Settele
  7. I. Palomo
  8. Karen J. Esler

Citations in the corpus