Counterfactual explanations and how to find them: literature review and benchmarking

By Riccardo Guidotti. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2022

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Interpretable machine learning aims at unveiling the reasons behind predictions returned by uninterpretable classifiers. One of the most valuable types of explanation consists of counterfactuals. A counterfactual explanation reveals what should have been different in an instance to observe a diverse outcome. For instance, a bank customer asks for a loan that is rejected. The counterfactual explanation consists of what should have been different for the customer in order to have the loan accepted. Recently, there has been an explosion of proposals for counterfactual explainers. The aim of this work is to survey the most recent explainers returning counterfactual explanations. We categorize explainers based on the approach adopted to return the counterfactuals, and we label them according to characteristics of the method and properties of the counterfactuals returned. In addition, we visually compare the explanations, and we report quantitative benchmarking assessing minimality, actionability, stability, diversity, discriminative power, and running time. The results make evident that the current state of the art does not provide a counterfactual explainer able to guarantee all these properties simultaneously.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22088210963a367ac66297ed4c945a9bfdf50afd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Longo Luca
  2. Mario Brcic
  3. Javier Del Ser
  4. Xinyi Zhou

Citations in the corpus