Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey

By S. Balsamo, A. Marco, P. Inverardi, Marta Simeoni. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2004

857 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Software

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21edcc4fc055c2613c23673245d19dff17e73cdf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Steffen Becker
2. Heiko Koziolek
3. Ralf H. Reussner
4. Lars Grunske

In Information Systems

1. Steffen Becker
2. Ralf H. Reussner
3. Lars Grunske
4. Heiko Koziolek

In Software

1. Steffen Becker
2. Heiko Koziolek
3. Ralf H. Reussner

Citations in the corpus

• Performance evaluation of component-based software systems: A survey (2010, background): “There are many more UML performance prediction approaches [1], which target object-oriented or monolithic systems instead of component-based systems.”
• The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction (2009, background): “The SPE community has put much effort into creating designer-friendly performance modelling notations, which can be transformed into the analytical models mentioned before (comprehensive survey in [2]).”
• Software Architecture Optimization Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (2013, background): “, for reliability [99], performance [22], [134], energy consumption [27], and safety [104].”