Reduced herbicide doses in field crops: A review

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rapid Evolution of Herbicide Resistance by Low Herbicide Dosages (2011, background): “Use of herbicides at reduced rates is risky because herbicide efficacy depends strongly on factors such as the competitive ability of the crops, the efficiency of herbicide application, the prevailing environment, and the crop growth stage (Blackshaw et al. 2006).”
Reducing the Risks of Herbicide Resistance: Best Management Practices and Recommendations (2012, background): “…programs often integrate herbicide application at below-label rates with other control measures, such as tillage and enhancement of crop competitiveness, to keep weed densities below economic threshold levels as defined by crop yield loss models (Blackshaw et al. 2006; O’Donovan et al. 2007).”
Weed-Competitive Ability of Spring and Winter Cereals in the Northern Great Plains (2010, unknown): “Herbicide application substantially reduced monocot weed biomass in spring cereals, but not in winter cereals, which was attributed to the importance of crop competition for herbicide efficacy (Blackshaw et al. 2006).”