Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints
By S. Armbruster, C. Pélabon, Thomas F. Hansen, C. Mulder. 2004
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21d0a9e0d3b71732417c463caa5400b7e062bb92
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Amy L. Parachnowitsch
- Robert R. Junker
- C. Klingenberg
- F. James Rohlf
- Dean C. Adams
- H. Tatsuta
- Dean C. Adams
- P. Gunz
Citations in the corpus
- Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity (2008, methodology): “…analyses hypothesized that selection causes functional and genetic modularity to converge (Cheverud 1996, Wagner 1996, Wagner & Altenberg 1996), and empirical studies have provided some support for this idea (Armbruster et al. 2004, Cheverud et al. 1997, Klingenberg et al. 2004, Mezey et al. 2000).”
- Working Towards a Holistic View on Flower Traits— How Floral Scents Mediate Plant-Animal Interactions in Concert with Other Floral Characters (2015, background): “It is useful to consider that flowers often have an integrated phenotype with fixed proportions between the dimensions of several morphological traits; such integration facilitates precision and thus efficiency of pollen transfer by pollinators that are forced to physically engage with flowers and t”