The Science of Mechanics: a Critical and Historical Account of its Development

By E. Mach, T. Mccormack. Nature, 2019

588 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Theoretical Computer Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21b20189c586b4de2fd6119dff9304c667a28b92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Simon R. Eugster
2. Francesco dell'Isola
3. John D. Norton

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. M. Hermele
2. R. Nandkishore
3. John D. Norton

In Theoretical Computer Science

1. John D. Norton

Citations in the corpus

• Exegesis of the Introduction and Sect. I from “Fundamentals of the Mechanics of Continua”** by E. Hellinger (2017, background): “Maybe Mach’s most important statement starts at the bottom of page 489 of [60]:”
• Fractons (2018, background): “[57] Ernst Mach, The science of mechanics: A critical and historical account of its development”
• Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism (2002, background): “ing in science was identified and discussed prominently a century ago by Mach (1906) and thought experiments have been used in science actively for many centuries more.”