Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making
By K. Tscherning, K. Helming, Bernd Krippner, Stefan Sieber, S. G. Paloma. 2012
317 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2191b98bb397f267e1b2baa451636d3377830ffd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- An interdisciplinary study on indicators: A comparative review of quality-of-life, macroeconomic, environmental, welfare and sustainability indicators (2013, methodology): “Moreover, the DPSIR framework has been criticised for: (a) imposing a hierarchy among its elements and, therefore, also a hierarchy of actors, that allows individuals to address only impacts (Tscherning et al., 2012); (b) for implying the existence of neutral knowledge of environmen-”
- Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations (2017, methodology): “DPSIR has been increasingly used for environmental issues and research projects (Meyar-Naimi and Vaez-Zadeh, 2012, Tscherning et al., 2012).”