Aid, Poverty Reduction and the 'New Conditionality'
By P. Mosley, John Hudson, A. Verschoor. 2004
410 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21776e54a4f904cd384445378b3b024240a5fcab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- Sarantis Kalyvitis
- G. Verhoef
- E. Anderson
- M. d’Orey
- Maren Duvendack
- George Economides
- Lucio Esposito
- Tewodaj Mogues
In Safety Research
- Sarantis Kalyvitis
- G. Verhoef
- E. Anderson
- M. d’Orey
- Maren Duvendack
- George Economides
- Lucio Esposito
- Tewodaj Mogues
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Foreign aid and governance in Africa (2016, neutral): “Second-strand: Aid does not lead to growth (or economic development) Mosley et al. (1992) Aid increases unproductive public consumption and fails to promote growth. Reichel (1995) Aid fails to promote savings owing to the substitution effect. Ghura (1995) Aid negatively impacts savings. Boone (1996)”
- What Determines Public Expenditure Allocations? A Review of Theories, and Implications for Agricultural Public Investment (2012, background): “New conditionality involves donors allowing short-term divergences from the mutually agreed upon or recipient-defined targets as a method of increasing trust before applying more pressure on recipient countries to meet targets (Mosley, Hudson, and Verschoor 2004).”
- The impact of foreign direct investment, foreign aid and trade on poverty reduction: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries (2020, background): “This is because average aggregation of household and firm income levels do not need to increase for foreign aid to reduce poverty (Lensink & White, 2000; Mosley et al., 2004; Mosley & Suleiman, 2007).”
- DOES GOVERNMENT SPENDING AFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY? A META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS (2017, neutral): “This is perhaps surprising, since health and education are often considered to be relatively ‘pro-poor’ components of government spending (Mosley et al. 2004), although there is evidence from studies such as Tanzi (1974), Alesina (1998) and Davoodi et al (2003) suggesting that much of the benefits o”
- Does foreign aid distort incentives and hurt growth? Theory and evidence from 75 aid-recipient countries (2008, background): “…Jensen and Paldam (2006) and Dalgaard et al. (2004), who have examined the relationship and/or joint determination of growth, aid and policy, and Mosley et al. (2004), who have examined the joint determination of poverty, aid and policy, have also recognized the possibility that aid may have…”
- Does Government Spending Affect Income Poverty? A Meta-regression Analysis (2018, background): “…education services and certain types of infrastructure (e.g., rural roads, water and sanitation, housing) is also widely considered to reduce poverty, by increasing the productivity and earnings potential of poor households (McKay, 2004; Mosley et al., 2004; Paternostro, Rajaram, & Tiongson, 2007).”