The variance of discounted Markov decision processes
By M. J. Sobel. 1982
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning, Game & Decision Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Marc G. Bellemare
- R´emi Munos
- Ofir Nachum
- Shimon Whiteson
- Yuxi Li
- David Silver
In Game & Decision Theory
- Tor Lattimore
- R´emi Munos
- Brendan O'Donoghue
- Prashanth L.A.
- José Antonio Arjona-Medina
- Michael Widrich
- Marcus Hutter
- John N. Tsitsiklis
Citations in the corpus
- RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewards (2018, background): “P a0ˇ(a 0js0). The local variance is Var s0;a0[q ˇ(s0;a0) js;a] = X s0 p(s0js;a) X a0 ˇ(a0js0) qˇ(s0;a0) 2 (A186) X s0 p(s0js;a) X a0 ˇ(a0js0) qˇ(s0;a0) !2 : This result is Equation (6) in Sobel 1982 [121]. Sobel derived these formulas also for finite horizons and an analog formula if the reward depe”
- The Uncertainty Bellman Equation and Exploration (2017, neutral): “The observation that the higher moments of a value function also satisfy a form of Bellman equation is not new and has been observed by some of the early papers on the subject (Sobel, 1982).”
- Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Regret Bounds (2018, background): “inty, Bayesian uncertainty, and model uncertainty. Epistemic uncertainty is distinct from the so-called aleatoric uncertainty or risk, which is the natural randomness of the process we are observing (Sobel, 1982; Tamar et al., 2016; Bellemare et al., 2017). This difference can be made clear by an ex”
- Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learning (2018, background): “Distributional reinforcement learning (Jaquette, 1973; Sobel, 1982; White, 1988; Morimura et al., 2010b; Bellemare et al., 2017) focuses on the intrinsic randomness of returns within the reinforcement learning (RL) framework.”
- A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “Combining with (10) we obtain Proposition 1 (Sobel, 1982) .”
- Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradients (2018, background): “Although the idea of estimating a distribution over returns has been revisited before (Sobel, 1982; Morimura et al., 2010), Bellemare et al. demonstrated that this estimation alone was enough to achieve state-of-the-art results on the Atari 2600 benchmarks.”
- PAC Bounds for Discounted MDPs (2012, methodology): “Lemma 8 (Sobel 1982).”
- On the Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model (2012, background): “…the sum of discounted rewards, like the expected value of the sum (value function), satisfies a Bellman-like equation, in which the variance of the value function plays the role of the instant reward (Munos & Moore, 1999; Sobel, 1982), to derive a sharp bound on the variance of the value function.”
- Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Sampling (2019, background): “This novel decomposition can be thought of as a generalization of the celebrated Bellman-equation of variance [Sobel, 1982] in the off-policy, episodic MDP setting with a finite sample and can be of independent interest.”
- Efficient exploration with Double Uncertain Value Networks (2017, background): “3) is certainly not new Sobel (1982); White (1988), nearly all RL research has focussed on the mean action-value.”
- Biases and Variance in Value Function Estimates (2004, background): “In particular, Sobel (1982) provides an expression for the internal variance in a Markov Decision Process with discounted rewards, while Filar et al. (1989) and Baukal-Gursoy and Ross (1992) consider the average reward criterion.”
- Mean-Variance Optimization in Markov Decision Processes (2011, background): “We note that expressions for the variance of the discounted reward for stationary policies were developed in Sobel (1982).”
- Policy Gradients with Variance Related Risk Criteria (2012, methodology): “We remark that similar equations for the infinite horizon discounted return case were presented by Sobel (1982), in which I−P ′ is replaced with I−βP , where β 1 is the discount factor.”
- The optimal unbiased value estimator and its relation to LSTD, TD and MC (2009, methodology): “C estimator with n paths available for estimation: V [V¯(n)] = MSE[V¯(n)] = 1 n [R] and P (|V¯(n)− V | ≥ ǫ) ≤ 2exp „ − ǫ2n 2 V [R]+ 2dǫ/3 « , where V [R] is the variance in the cumulated reward (see (Sobel, 1982) for the variance of a MRP) and d is an upper bound for the cumulated reward of any path”
- Actor-Critic Algorithms for Risk-Sensitive MDPs (2013, methodology): “From the Bellman equation of Λ(x), proposed by Sobel [19], it is straightforward to derive Bellman equations for U(x) and the square reward action-value function W(x, a) 4 = E [ D(x, a)(2) ] (see Appendix B.”
- Bias and variance in value function estimation (2004, unknown): “An expression for the variance of Z for discounted reward was given by Sobel (1982).”
- Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning (2021, background): “Another line of work considers the mean-variance criterion (Sobel, 1982), but this metric has undesirable properties as it is not a coherent risk metric.”
- Fully Parameterized Quantile Function for Distributional Reinforcement Learning (2019, background): “Distributional reinforcement learning [Jaquette et al., 1973, Sobel, 1982, White, 1988, Morimura et al., 2010, Bellemare et al., 2017] differs from value-based reinforcement learning in that, instead of focusing only on the expectation of the return, distributional reinforcement learning also takes…”