Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytical perspective

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy (2013, methodology): “The connectedness of the two spheres of experience is demonstrated by the therapist recycling a key description from the client’s utterance (see Peräkylä, 2004) (lines 4 and 7: in any case it doesn’t happen like this).”
Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying Transformative Sequences (2019, background): “Most of the CA research on psychotherapy has focused on a therapist’s actions, such as formulations (e.g., Antaki, 2008), interpretations (e.g., Bercelli, Rossano, & Viaro, 2008; Peräkylä, 2004), or questions (e.g., MacMartin, 2008).”
The Responsiveness Problem in Psychotherapy: A Review of Proposed Solutions (2015, background): “For example, Peräkylä (2004) studied the process of making interpretations in create a match between the different domains of experience by shaping the description of the client’s experience to display the similarity of the experiences linked by the interpretation.”
Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy (2010, methodology): “In the analysis of the data we use especially the applications of conversation analysis that are specialized in the study of institutional interaction (Arminen, 2005; Drew & Heritage, 1992; Peräkylä, 2004a).”