Time Trends in Pulmonary Embolism in the United States: Evidence of Overdiagnosis

By R. Wiener, Lisa M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2010

699 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) may improve detection of life-threatening pulmonary embolism. But this sensitive test may have a downside: overdiagnosis and overtreatment (finding clinically unimportant emboli and exposing patients to harms from unnecessary treatment). Methods To assess the impact of CTPA on national pulmonary embolism incidence, mortality, and treatment complications, we conducted a time trend analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Multiple Cause-of-Death databases. We compared age-adjusted incidence, mortality, and treatment complications (in-hospital gastrointestinal or intracranial hemorrhage or secondary thrombocytopenia) of pulmonary embolism among United States adults before (1993–1998) and after (1998–2006) CTPA was introduced. Results Pulmonary embolism incidence was unchanged before CTPA (p=0.63), but increased substantially after CTPA (81% increase: from 62.1 to 112.3 per 100,000, p<0.001). Pulmonary embolism mortality decreased during both periods: more so before CTPA (8% reduction: from 13.4 to 12.3 per 100,000, p<0.001) than after (3% reduction: from 12.3 to 11.9 per 100,000, p=0.02). Case-fatality improved slightly before (8% decrease, from 13.2% to 12.1%, p=0.02) and substantially after CTPA (36% decrease: from 12.1% to 7.8%, p<0.001). Meanwhile, CTPA was associated with an increase in presumed complications of anticoagulation for pulmonary embolism: pre-CTPA, the complication rate was stable (p=0.24), but post-CTPA it increased by 71% (from 3.1 to 5.3 per 100,000, p<0.001). Conclusions The introduction of CTPA was associated with changes consistent with overdiagnosis: rising incidence, minimal change in mortality, and lower case-fatality. Better technology allows us to diagnose more emboli, but to minimize harms of overdiagnosis we must learn which ones matter.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2157d39cf6fc0eb2f0ead1b7a26bb9cb67899290

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

  1. Jeroen J. Bax
  2. P. Lancellotti
  3. G. Agnelli

In Internal Medicine

  1. G. Agnelli

Citations in the corpus