Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being

By Veljko Jovanovic. 2015

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/214adc85399990118302c79d2b0b7bd6259f45f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. L. Giuntoli
2. C. Sica
3. Francesco Ceccarini
4. Corrado Caudek

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. L. Giuntoli
2. C. Sica
3. Francesco Ceccarini
4. Corrado Caudek

In Social Psychology

1. L. Giuntoli
2. C. Sica
3. Francesco Ceccarini
4. Corrado Caudek

Citations in the corpus

• Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (2017, background): “Recently, Jovanović (2015) showed that the SPANE subscales explain more variance than the PANAS in life satisfaction, depression, and general well-being.”