Growth and entrepreneurship
By Zoltan J. Acs, David B. Audretsch, P. Braunerhjelm, B. Carlsson. Small Business Economics, 2011
417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/214539e19a126750191fcf6a0ccb6ebe6785e6e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Erik E. Lehmann
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Alain Fayolle
- Haifeng Qian
- Massimiliano Guerini
In Information Systems
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Zoltan J. Acs
- David B. Audretsch
- Erik E. Lehmann
- V. Rusu
- Ovidiu Stoica
- A. Roman
Citations in the corpus
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, methodology): “4 See for instance Acs et al. (2012), Audretsch and Keilbach (2004a), Audretsch and Keilbach (2008), Wennekers and Thurik (1999), among others. 5 In this article, we use indistinctively institutional approach, institutional perspective, institutional theory, institutional economics and institutional”
- The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (2014, background): “The same holds for other regions with low growth rates in the UK and Ireland (Acs et al. 2012).”
- The effect of social, cultural, and economic factors on entrepreneurship (2015, background): “Specialist literature considers entrepreneurial activity of high relevance (Acs & Szerb, 2007; Acs et al., 2012; Audretsch & Keilbach, 2004, 2008; Audretsch et al., 2006, 2008; Noseleit, 2013).”
- The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries (2020, background): “Compared to traditional factors of production (capital and labor), knowledge would have a substantial impact on economic growth due to its propagation to be used by third parties’ enterprises [4,5].”
- Effects of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship on economic growth: panel data evidence (2017, background): “Some studies (Acs et al. 2012; Aparicio, Urbano, and Audretsch 2016; Audretsch and Keilbach 2008) suggest that knowledge-based entrepreneurship based (opportunity entrepreneurship) impacts economic growth more than other types of entrepreneurship not based on knowledge (necessity entrepreneurship).”
- Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, methodology): “Following the appendix of Wong et al. (2005) and Acs et al. (2012) to linearize the production function, we use the natural logarithm in the variables that represent institutional factors as well as the endowments assessed in our growth model.”
- National systems of entrepreneurship (2016, positive): “…but commercialized independent of this organization via the creation of a new firm, the entrepreneurs not only serve as a conduit for the spillover of knowledge, but also for the ensuing innovative activity and enhanced economic performance (Acs et al. 2009, 2012; Audretsch and Caiazza 2015).”