The ATLASGAL survey: a catalog of dust condensations in the Galactic plane

By T. Csengeri, J. Urquhart, F. Schuller, Fr'ed'erique Motte, S. Bontemps, F. Wyrowski, K. Menten, L. Bronfman, H. Beuther, Th. Henning and 3 more. 2013

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The formation processes and the evolutionary stages of high-mass stars are poorly understood compared to low-mass stars. Large-scale surveys are needed to provide an unbiased census of high column density sites which can potentially host precursors to high-mass stars. Here we use the ATLASGAL survey covering 420 sq. degree of the Galactic plane at 870 micron; and use the MRE-GLC method to identify the population of embedded sources throughout the inner Galaxy. We identify in total 10952 compact sub-millimeter sources with fluxes above 5 sigma. Completeness tests show that our catalogue is 97% complete above 5 sigma and >99% complete above 7 sigma. We correlate this sample with mid-infrared point source catalogues (MSX at 21.3 micron and WISE at 22 micron) and determine a lower limit of ~33% that are associated with embedded protostellar objects. We note that the proportion of clumps associated with mid-infrared sources increases with increasing flux density, achieving a rather constant fraction of ~75% of all clumps with fluxes over 5 Jy/beam being associated with star-formation. Examining the source counts as a function of Galactic longitude we are able to identify the most prominent star forming regions in the Galaxy. From the fraction of the likely massive quiescent clumps (~25%) we estimate a formation time-scale of ~7.25+/-2.50 x 10^4~yr for the deeply embedded phase before the emergence of luminous YSOs. Such a short duration for the formation of high-mass stars in massive clumps clearly proves that the earliest phases have to be dynamic with supersonic motions.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2108a5c1b7c11990187af726a6438b4c758cbda8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Pillai
  2. F. Wyrowski
  3. F. Schuller
  4. K. Menten
  5. L. Bronfman
  6. T. Csengeri
  7. J. Urquhart
  8. Leiden

In Instrumentation

  1. Ljmu
  2. T. Pillai
  3. F. Wyrowski
  4. S. Lumsden
  5. Liverpool John Moores
  6. K. Menten
  7. Leiden
  8. C. Walmsley

Citations in the corpus