FAST LARGE-SAMPLE GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR COPULAS
By Ivan Kojadinovic, Jun Yan, Mark Holmes. 2011
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20f7134261df2d30d57db4cbff44d5ca5aa1fec1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- G. Salvadori
- Carlo De Michele
- Fabrizio Durante
- Claudia Czado
- Mathias W. Hofmann
- S. Jeske
- Jun Yan
- Ivan Kojadinovic
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Carlo De Michele
- G. Salvadori
- Fabrizio Durante
- Claudia Czado
- Jun Yan
- Ivan Kojadinovic
- Mathias W. Hofmann
- S. Jeske
In Statistics and Probability
- Carlo De Michele
- Fabrizio Durante
- G. Salvadori
- Mojca Šraj
- Nejc Bezak
- M. Brilly
- Ivan Kojadinovic
- Jun Yan
Citations in the corpus
- On the return period and design in a multivariate framework (2011, methodology): “The ability of this copula to model the available bivariate data is checked via multivariate goodness-of-fit tests (Berg, 2009; Genest et al., 2009; Kojadinovic et al., 2011): the resulting large p -values indicate that the Gumbel copula C QV cannot be rejected at all standard levels.”
- Selection strategies for regular vine copulae (2013, methodology): “…defined as While [Genest and Remillard, 2008] provide a computationally expensive parametric bootstrap procedure for the calculation of the corresponding p -value, [Kojadinovic and Yan, 2011] and [Kojadinovic et al., 2011] developed a multiplier approach to obtain approximate p -values much faster.”
- Goodness‐of‐fit testing based on a weighted bootstrap: A fast large‐sample alternative to the parametric bootstrap (2012, methodology): “This resampling technique, based on the multiplier central limit theorem for empirical processes (see e.g. van der Vaart and Wellner, 2000; Kosorok, 2008), was recently used for assessing the goodness of fit of copula models in Kojadinovic, Yan, and Holmes (2011).”
- Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River (2015, methodology): “All other copulas from Table II were considered; the results of the Cramér-von Mises test SIn and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test τn for the pair Q-V are presented in Table IV. p-values were calculated based on the parametric bootstrap or multipliers (Kojadinovic et al., 2011) procedure with 10 000 runs.”
- Trivariate Frequency Analyses of Peak Discharge, Hydrograph Volume and Suspended Sediment Concentration Data Using Copulas (2014, unknown): “1−exp −u3θ2ð Þð Þ ( ) Asymmetric Clayton-M4 u1−θ2 þ u2−θ2−1 θ1 θ2 þ u3−θ1−1 − 1θ1 can be calculated with the parametric bootstrap procedure defined by Genest and Remillard (2008) or by a little bit faster procedure based on multiplier central limit theorem (Kojadinovic et al. 2011).”