ZenCrowd: leveraging probabilistic reasoning and crowdsourcing techniques for large-scale entity linking
By Gianluca Demartini, Djellel Eddine Difallah, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. The Web Conference, 2012
513 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20d3c2e8f9f5440b34a12dadb14e33defde587ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- M. Franklin
- Jiannan Wang
- Sanjay Krishnan
- Adam Marcus
- Aditya G. Parameswaran
- Jianyong Wang
- Jiawei Han
- Eugene Wu
In Computer Science Applications
- M. Franklin
- Jiannan Wang
- Adam Marcus
- Aditya G. Parameswaran
- Guoliang Li
- Yudian Zheng
- Sanjay Krishnan
- Reynold Cheng
In Management Science and Operations Research
- M. Franklin
- Jiannan Wang
- Sanjay Krishnan
- Adam Marcus
- Aditya G. Parameswaran
- Eugene Wu
- Guoliang Li
- Yudian Zheng
Citations in the corpus
- SURF: improving classifiers in production by learning from busy and noisy end users (2020, methodology): “We will compare SURF to two groups of crowdsourcing algorithms: GROUP 1: Dawid-Skene (DS) [1], iBCC [3], EBCC [6], LFC [8]) and GROUP 2: ZenCrowd (ZC) [2], CATD [5], GLAD [12], Majority Vote (MV) ) For each instantiation of the parameters we vary we run the experiments 10 times, resampling N = 1000 ”
- Revolt: Collaborative Crowdsourcing for Labeling Machine Learning Datasets (2017, background): “However, despite its efficiency, researchers have also reported difficulty obtaining high quality labels using crowdsourcing [3, 16].”
- Toward Annotator Group Bias in Crowdsourcing (2021, unknown): “We compare our proposed framework GroupAnno with nine existing true label inference methods (Zheng et al., 2017), including majority voting (MV), ZenCrowd (Demartini et al., 2012), Mini-max (Zhou et al., 2012), LFC-binary (Raykar et al., 2010), CATD (Li et al., 2014a), PM-CRH (Aydin et al., 2014), K”
- Crowdsourced Data Management: Industry and Academic Perspectives (2015, methodology): “This work has focused primarily on combining machine learning methods with crowdsourcing; crowdsourcing is typically used for verifying predicted matches [189, 68, 85]; in some cases, it is also used to provide training data for matching algorithms [138, 192, 85].”
- Entity Linking with a Knowledge Base: Issues, Techniques, and Solutions (2015, background): “For the purpose of simplicity, many studies [60, 62,75,92,93,119,121] suppose that the knowledge base contains all the mapping entities for all the entity mentions, and thus ignore the unlinkable problem of entity mentions.”
- Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey (2016, background): “Graph-based methods [22], [26], [28], [64], [112], [136], [137].”
- Corleone: hands-off crowdsourcing for entity matching (2014, background): “Current works use the crowd to verify predicted matches [30, 31, 6], finds the best questions to ask the crowd [33], and finds the best UI to pose such questions [34].”
- Evaluating the Quality of Learning Resources: A Learnersourcing Approach (2021, background): “Most of the state-of-the-art consensus approaches developed within crowdsourcing community rely on black-box machine learning algorithms (e.g., [37], [65]) for aggregating crowd-sourced decisions.”
- Truth Inference in Crowdsourcing: Is the Problem Solved? (2017, methodology): “The single-choice tasks are especially studied in [34, 16, 15, 53, 41, 61, 35, 30, 27, 46, 5].”