PUTTING SEXUAL TRAITS INTO THE CONTEXT OF AN ORGANISM: A LIFE-HISTORY PERSPECTIVE IN STUDIES OF SEXUAL SELECTION

By A. Badyaev, A. Qvarnström. 2002

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20c1bb3bb84f7559d5bee3ea34f1e90a1b1f4ab6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Female choice for song characteristics in the house finch (2004, background): “The preference of female house finches for increased song length and song rate fits a general cross-species pattern of female choice for males with the most elaborate expression of a preferred trait, particularly in morphological characteristics ( Andersson 1994 ).”
Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection (2006, background): “This is because male attractiveness is often subject to life-history trade-offs (Grafen 1990b, Kokko 2001), and males can adaptively adjust their current investment in attractiveness in response to environmental challenges (Badyaev & Qvarnström 2002, Candolin 2000, Hunt et al. 2004a).”
Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains (2008, background): “…are prone to different conclusions if females of the species use a combination of cues in their mate selection sequences (Fiske et al. 1994; Mateos1998) or ifbetween-femaleand/or within-femalevariations in preferences occur (Jennions & Petrie 1997; Widemo & Sæther 1999; Badyaev & Qvanström 2002).”
AVIAN SEXUAL DICHROMATISM IN RELATION TO PHYLOGENY AND ECOLOGY (2003, background): “Whereas several studies suggested that loss of male ornamentation can be favored by adaptive female preference (Badyaev & Qvarnstr¨om 2002, Qvarnstr¨om et al. 2000, Saetre et al. 1997), comparative studies reveal that loss and gain of sexual ornamentation often precedes changes in preference for…”
Paternal care as a conditional strategy: Distinct reproductive tactics associated with elaboration of plumage ornamentation in the house finch (2002, background): “…and residual reproductive value, selection should favor phenotypic plasticity in reproductive investment such that individuals adopt the reproductive tactic that allows them to achieve the highest fitness under given conditions (reviewed in Badyaev and Qvarnström, 2002; Gross, 1996; Kokko, 1998).”
A functional perspective on sexual selection: insights and future prospects (2006, background): “All rights reserved. do so at the expense of functional or physiological capacities associated with survival (see Kokko 2001; Badyaev & Qvarnström 2002; Kokko et al. 2003).”
Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity (2003, background): “In this case, current reproductive behaviour in part reﬂects previous allocation decisions, suggesting that PE and ME, similar to many life-history traits, can be traded-off over an individual’s lifetime [32,33].”
Diet quality affects an attractive white plumage pattern in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) (2007, background): “If so, the type or amount of information conveyed by variation in tail-white size may differ across environments (Badyaev and Qvarnström 2002).”