Toward a Science of Cyber–Physical System Integration

By Janos Sztipanovits, Xenofon D. Koutsoukos, Gabor Karsai, Nicholas Kottenstette, Panos J. Antsaklis, Vijay Gupta, Bill Goodwine, John S. Baras, Shige Wang. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Hardware and Architecture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2074d749e61c4b1ccbf957fe18efe00fa590a124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Okyay Kaynak
2. Carlo Fischione
3. Chenyang Lu
4. Sinem Coleri Ergen
5. P. Park
6. Yang Shi
7. Shen Yin
8. Karl Henrik Johansson

In Hardware and Architecture

1. Yang Shi
2. Karl Henrik Johansson

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting active perception (2016, unknown): “In principle, an active perception system can be evaluated in terms of its performance on the tasks that it is supposed to accomplish (or the performance of its components) and can be evaluated using basic techniques of systems engineering (such as, Sztipanovits et al. 2012).”
• Wireless Network Design for Control Systems: A Survey (2017, background): “In particular, WNCS are strongly related to CPS and Tactile Internet since these emerging techniques deal with the real-time control of physical systems over the networks.”
• Industrial Cyberphysical Systems: A Backbone of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (2017, background): “Considering the key trends identified [9], [11], [22], [52]–[63], including information-driven interaction, distributed business processes, cloud computing and visualization, cooperation, multicore systems and graphics processing unit computing, and SOA-ready devices, the key question that arises is”