Pseudopatterns and dual-network memory models: Advantages and shortcomings
By R. M. French, Bernard Ans, Stephane Rousset. 2000
31 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Brendan McCane
- Konstantin Shmelkov
- Cordelia Schmid
- Anthony V. Robins
- Craig Atkinson
- Lech Szymanski
- Alahari Karteek
Citations in the corpus
- Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting (2017, background): “The problem of addressing these issues in neural networks has its origin in classical connectionist networks several years ago [2, 11–13, Li and Hoiem [23] use knowledge distillation for one of the classical vision tasks, image classification, formulated in a deep learning framework.”
- Sequential learning in neural networks: A review and a discussion of pseudorehearsal based methods (2004, unknown): “Similarly, French et al. [22] argue that where the density of the data varies over different regions of the function then the density of the pseudoitems generated should match this distribution.”
- Pseudo-Rehearsal: Achieving Deep Reinforcement Learning without Catastrophic Forgetting (2018, methodology): “These methods are further extended by separating the learning agent into two parts, an idea which stems from early research into CF [14], [15], [16] and is still being utilised in recent algorithms such as Deep Generative Dual Memory Network [17] for incremental image classification and others (e.”