Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-environmental Measures

By I. Vanslembrouck, G. Van Huylenbroeck, Wim Verbeke. 2002

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20550b7ae9e84d1756364afb8b83d123e462ee2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution (2013, background): “Previous studies on farmer participation in voluntary agrienvironmental schemes (Morris and Potter, 1995; Polman and Slangen, 2008; Vanslembrouck et al., 2002; Wilson, 1997; Wilson and Hart, 2000) have analysed farmers' contingent behaviour by applying survey data and qualitative interviews.”
Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda (2015, result): “…consistent with other studies which have found that together with attitudes and beliefs, age relates to views on sustainability (Comer et al., 1999; Vanslembrouck et al., 2002), orientation towards sustainable and efficient agriculture (van Passel et al., 2007; Lobley et al., 2009), up-take of…”
Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach (2008, neutral): “Among the recent innovations aimed at accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice models are the mixed logit (Train, 1998; McFadden and Train, 2000) and latent class models are a special case of these (Wedel and Kamakura, 2000).”
Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes : regionalisation and the role of bridging social capital (2017, neutral): “…that working tidily was central to their self-image and self-esteem: “keeping crops tidy, that’s my source of professional pride”, and “nature must be tidy, otherwise I’m not happy with myself—it must be maintained” (see also Vanslembrouck et al., 2002; Silvasti, 2003; Dessein and Nevens, 2007).”
Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus (2016, background): “There is a growing theoretical and empirical economic literature on the reasons why farmers choose whether or not to sign an agri-environmental contract (Vanslembrouck et al., 2002; Peerlings and Polman, 2009; Christensen et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2012).”
Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers’ Decision-Making (2018, background): “The results here are mixed, partly because of the large differences in what was measured specifically, from the importance of ‘clean fields’ [53] to ‘farm image’ [14], but also the influence of ‘symbolic capital’, for example on participation in AESs, depends strongly on which type of image is impor”
Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “It appears that some farm types are much more appropriate to have multifunctional activities than others (Gilg and Battershill, 1999; McNally, 2001; Vanslembrouck et al., 2002; Loureiro and Jervell, 2005; Jongeneel et al., 2005).”