New directions in attachment theory and research

By Phillip R. Shaver, Mario Mikulincer. 2010

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/204d70876360d07dbdc7387d6d45fb1beb0abef9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. R. Wilkinson
2. G. Karantzas
3. G. Carlo
4. Judith A. Feeney
5. L. Kurdek
6. Phillip R. Shaver
7. K. Cripps
8. Brett Zyromski

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. G. Carlo
2. Judith A. Feeney

In Social Psychology

1. R. Wilkinson
2. G. Karantzas
3. G. Carlo
4. Judith A. Feeney
5. G. Bachman
6. Laura K. Guerrero
7. L. Kurdek
8. Phillip R. Shaver

Citations in the corpus

• Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attachment Style Questionnaires (2010, background): “…measure For over two decades, applying attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969, 1982) to adult close relationships has yielded important insights into relationship processes (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2010; Simpson Journal of Social and Personal Relationships © The Author(s), 2010.”
• Empathy as a mediator of the relations between parent and peer attachment and prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors in Mexican American college students (2012, background): “The ability to form attachment relationships in adolescence and adulthood is important as the basis for intimate and romantic relationships (Hazan & Shaver, 1994; Saferstein, Neimeyer, & Hagans, 2005; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2010).”