mentha: a resource for browsing integrated protein-interaction networks
By Alberto C, L. Castagnoli, G. Cesareni. Nature Methods, 2013
322 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/204b91cb77b64daaa771f7391e9470976ed70901
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Lukasz Kurgan
- Zhenling Peng
- Sylvie Ricard-Blum
- Michael Tognolli
- Ruth C. Lovering
- Vladimir N Uversky
- Fanchi Meng
- Zsuzsanna Dosztányi
Citations in the corpus
- A scored human protein–protein interaction network to catalyze genomic interpretation (2017, unknown): “For each of the 15,189 PPI identified in draft-PPI, we computed three predictors: (1) Heavy to light ratio, (2) Jaccard similarity coefficient; and (3) Edge betweenness centrality.”
- High-throughput prediction of RNA, DNA and protein binding regions mediated by intrinsic disorder (2015, methodology): “number of its protein partners in the PPI network collected from the latest integrated database mentha (59), and the number of its predicted disordered proteinbinding regions (see Materials and Methods for details).”
- The MIntAct project—IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases (2013, methodology): “The MENTHA interactome browser (26) will continue to be built on the PSICQUIC web services of IMex databases (6) and BioGRID (27), as before.”