The SDSS DR6 luminosity functions of galaxies

By A. Montero-Dorta, Francisco Prada. 2008

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present number counts, luminosity functions (LFs) and luminosity densities of galaxies obtained using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Sixth Data Release in all SDSS photometric bands. Thanks to the SDSS DR6, galaxy statistics have increased by a factor of ∼ 9 in the u-band and by a factor of ∼ 4 − 5 in the rest of the SDSS bands with respect to the previous work of Blanton et al. (2003b). In addition, we have achieved a high redshift completeness in our galaxy samples. Firstly, by making use of the survey masks, provided by the NYU-VAGC DR6, we have been able to define an area on the sky of high angular redshift completeness. Secondly, we guarantee that brightness-dependent redshift incompleteness is small within the magnitude ranges that define our galaxy samples. With these advances, we have estimated very accurate SDSS DR6 LFs in both the bright and the faint end. In the 0.1 r-band, our SDSS DR6 luminosity function is well fitted by a Schechter LF with parameters �� = 0.90 ±0.07, M�−5log10h = −20.73±0.04and � = −1.23±0.02. As compared with previous results, we find some notable differences. In the bright end of the 0.1 u-band luminosity function we find a remarkable excess, of ∼ 1.7 dex at M0.1u ≃ −20.5, with respect to the bestfit Schechter LF. This excess weakens in the 0.1 g-band, fading away towards the very red 0.1 z-band. A preliminary analysis on the nature of this bright-end bump reveals that it is mostly comprised of active galaxies and QSOs. It seems, therefore, that an important fraction of this exceeding luminosity may come from nuclear activity. In the faint end of the SDSS DR6 luminosity functions, where we can reach 1 − 1.5 magnitudes deeper than the previous SDSS LF estimation, we obtain a steeper slope, that increases from the 0.1 u-band, with � = −1.01 ± 0.03, to the very red 0.1 z-band, with � = −1.26±0.03. These state-of-the-art results may be used to constrain a variety of aspects of star formation histories and/or feed-back processes in galaxy formation models.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2036ef7a1de370a7b42a7d0d8ef93ea68ba7b48f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. R. Somerville
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Volker Springel
  6. Joel R. Primack
  7. Christopher J. Conselice
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus