Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands

By J. Kind. 2014

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2021e61bf3f60c25cf2cf568f539c55108f75942

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies (2019, background): “…dike investments and climate change adaptation funds (Ward et al. 2017), countrywide benefit–cost analyses of optimal flood protection standards in The Netherlands (Kind 2014), and benefit–cost analyses that guide local building code policies in cities, including New York City (Aerts et al. 2014).”
The safe development paradox: An agent-based model for flood risk under climate change in the European Union (2020, result): “The latter approach is similar to the one taken by the government in the Netherlands, which is currently one of the most proactive governments concerning flood risk reduction (Kind, 2014).”
A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas (2017, background): “Since optimisation studies are complex and rare in practice 13 , we also test two simpler objectives.”
Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps (2013, background): “…market prices that relate to either the actual cost of implementation (see Fuchs et al., 2007a; Pfurtscheller and Schwarze, 2010; Stoffel, 2005; Kind, 2013; Kreibich et al., 2011; European Commission, 2008; Von Ungern-Sternberg, 2004; Schwarze et al., 2011) or income loss due to the disruption…”
Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions (2015, background): “USACE (1992) and Peterman and Anderson (1999) both showed that taking ranges of uncertainty into account can lead to different decisions than using single value estimates.”
A Review of Cost Estimates for Flood Adaptation (2018, background): “The purpose is to provide regional to global flood risk assessment studies with an overview of different flood adaptation measures and their unit costs so they can be included in, for example, cost–benefit analyses or other evaluation studies [12].”