What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta‐Analysis of Potential Factors

By Alexis M. May, E. Klonsky. 2016

515 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/201c7bf3b8418e05526e14c52f2f37bf38880448

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Craig J. Bryan
2. T. Joiner
3. M. Rudd
4. Megan L. Rogers
5. E. Klonsky

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Megan L. Rogers
2. T. Joiner

Citations in the corpus

• The Importance of Temporal Dynamics in the Transition From Suicidal Thought to Behavior (2016, background): “As May and Klonsky (2016) highlight in their meta-analysis, however, a frustratingly large number of studies driven by this question are unable to provide useful answers about suicidal behavior in particular, although many are sufficient to answer the question, “Why consider suicide?””
• Rumination, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicide Attempts: A Meta-Analytic Review (2017, background): “The majority of identified risk factors for suicide, including depression, hopelessness, and most psychiatric disorders, relate only to suicidal ideation, as opposed to suicide attempts or death by suicide specifically (May & Klonsky, 2016).”
• Risk Factors for Suicide Ideation Differ From Those for the Transition to Suicide Attempt: The Importance of Creativity, Rigor, and Urgency in Suicide Research (2016, unknown): “We were invited to comment on the article by May and Klonsky (2016) titled “What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators?”