Sets for Mathematics

By F. Lawvere, R. Rosebrugh. 2003

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20180a04f89c9deeb5a799b766e5c409bcdbb228

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Dirk Hofmann
2. Gavin J. Seal
3. Walter Tholen
4. A. Doering
5. C. Isham
6. Tadahisa Funaki
7. David K. Hammond
8. Lee H. Dicker

Citations in the corpus

• Elementary quotient completion (2012, unknown): “Lawvere to synthetize the structural properties of logical systems, see (Lawvere 1969a; Lawvere 1969b; Lawvere 1970), see also (Lawvere and Rosebrugh 2003) for a unified survey.”
• “What is a Thing?”: Topos Theory in the Foundations of Physics (2008, background): “We found the following books useful: [54, 29, 56, 48, 8, 52].”
• Monoidal topology : a categorical approach to order, metric, and topology (2014, background): “Beginners of category theory will enjoy the books [Lawvere and Rosebrugh, 2003] and [Awodey, 2006] while advanced readers are referred to [Kelly, 1982] as the standard text on enriched category theory, and to [Johnstone, 2002a,b] as a rich resource for a broad range of categorical topics.”