Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable? Economic Growth Over the Very Long Run
By Charles I. Jones. 2001
532 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20050bc9af02932f4185600a472414626a4c18c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Nico Voigtländer
- N. Lagerloef
- H. Voth
- Oded Galor
- Holger Strulik
- Matthias Doepke
- Luis Angeles
- Omer Moav
Citations in the corpus
- 15 years of new growth economics: What have we learnt? (2002, unknown): “The recent of work of Hall and Jones (1999), Acemoglu, D. S. Johnson and J. Robinson (2000) and MacArthur and Sachs (2001) are excellent examples of this.”
- Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth (2003, background): “Our contention that IPR protection is an important determinant of growth is echoed by the work of Jones (2001), who argues that property rights protection is responsible for the emergence of the “industrial revolution” in the 20th century.”
- From Stagnation to Sustained Growth: The Role of Female Empowerment (2013, background): “…from high birth and death rates to low birth and 2 The seminal work of Galor and Weil was quickly followed by new contributions for example, Jones (2001), Lucas (2002), Hansen and Prescott (2002), Galor and Moav (2002), Doepke (2004), Galor (2005), Cervellati and Sunde (2005), Strulik and…”
- Why England? Demographic factors, structural change and physical capital accumulation during the Industrial Revolution (2006, methodology): “We therefore take the models by Galor and Moav (2002), Galor and Weil (2000), Jones (2001), Kögel and Prskawetz (2001) and Cervellati and Sunde (2005) as our starting point.”
- It's Not Factor Accumulation : Stylized Facts and Growth Models (2001, unknown): “Jones, Charles (1997).”
- The Role of Energy in the Industrial Revolution and Modern Economic Growth (2012, methodology): “Population evolves according to Jones’ (2001) demographic model.”
- Endogenous gender power, household labor supply and the demographic transition (2007, background): “A non-exhaustive list includes Becker, Murphy, and Tamura (1990), Galor and Weil (1996, 2000), Galor and Moav (2002, 2004), Moav (2002), Greenwood, Seshadri, and Yorukoglu (2005), Hansen and Prescott (2002), Jones (2001), and Iyigun (2000).”
- A model of longevity, fertility and growth (2002, unknown): “Galor and Weil, 1998; Kremer, 1993; Jones, 1999; Tamura, 1996, 1999).”
- The Economic and Demographic Transition, Mortality, and Comparative Development (2013, unknown): “In the simulations below, we adopt Jones’ (2001) specification, which is a generalization of the original contribution of Romer (1990) allowing for decreasing returns,”
- Demographic transitions: analyzing the effects of mortality on fertility (2008, background): “…section of the literature points towards raising GDP per capita (Becker and Lewis 1973, de la Croix and Doepke 2003) or technological progress (Galor and Weil 2000, Jones 2001, Kogel and Prskawets 2001, Hansen and Prescott 2002, Cervellati and Sunde 2005) as the cause behind falling fertility.”
- The Facts of Economic Growth (2015, background): “e This discussion is related to the famous Uzawa theorem about the restrictions on technical change required to obtain balanced growth; see Schlicht (2006) and Jones and Scrimgeour (2008). 14 Handbook of Macroeconomics”