The Adult Attachment Interview

By June Rathbone. 2001

1,141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ff02612d589a14ec5f71a0b6961ec88aed7726d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Peter Fonagy
2. P. Luyten
3. Carla Sharp
4. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
5. E. Hesse
6. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
7. Robyn Fivush
8. A. Huth-Bocks

In Social Psychology

1. Peter Fonagy
2. P. Luyten
3. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
4. E. Hesse
5. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
6. Robyn Fivush
7. M. Main
8. A. Huth-Bocks

Citations in the corpus

• Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: a twenty-year longitudinal study. (2000, methodology): “Fifty of these participants (21 males, 29 females) were relocated 20 years later and agreed to participate in the Berkeley Adult Attachment Interview (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985).”
• Coping, Attachment, and Mother-Child Narratives of Stressful Events (2006, background): “Main and her colleagues (Main, Kaplan, & Cassidy, 1985; Hesse, 1999) have extended the attachment construct into adulthood.”
• Offending and attachment: The relationship between interpersonal awareness and offending in a prison population with psychiatric disorder (2004, neutral): “The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) (George et al., 1985).”
• The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups (2009, methodology): “…Scientific Information) and PsycLIT (search terms for WoS and PsycLit: AAI, Adult Attachment Interview; WoS citations to Main & Goldwyn, 1984, 1991; George et al., 1985; van IJzendoorn & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 1996; and references in the selected studies to clinical AAI studies) and through…”
• Primary Attachment to Parents and Peers during Adolescence: Differences by Attachment Style (2001, neutral): “…argue that attachment style cannot be adequately assessed from paper-and-pencil questionnaires (Crowell et al., 1999; Main, 1991; Main et al., 1985), because socially or personally desirable answers may interfere with internal representations of attachment relationships (George et al., 1985).”
• The impact of domestic violence on mothers' prenatal representations of their infants (2004, background): “Like other attachment interviews (i.e., the AAI; George et al., 1985), emphasis is placed on both the process and content of participants’ narratives.”