The Application of Attachment Theory and Family Systems Theory to the Phenomena of Parentification

By Lisa M. Hooper. 2007

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fd0d5e44e8aacd9f2ae79d49fbe9981a1b0ec70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. B. Garber
2. Jennifer A. Kam
3. Peter J. Jankowski
4. Lisa M. Hooper
5. Steven J. Sandage

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Peter J. Jankowski
2. Jennifer A. Kam
3. Lisa M. Hooper
4. B. Garber
5. N. Hannah
6. Steven J. Sandage

Citations in the corpus

• PARENTAL ALIENATION AND THE DYNAMICS OF THE ENMESHED PARENT–CHILD DYAD: ADULTIFICATION, PARENTIFICATION, AND INFANTILIZATION (2011, background): “This discussion presumes an understanding of alienation consistent with the “alienated child” construct (Johnston, 2005b; Kelly & Johnston, 2001) and built upon a foundation in family systems (Minuchin, 1974) and attachment theories (Bowlby, 1982, 1988; Garber, 2004a; Hooper, 2007).”
• The Effects of Language Brokering Frequency and Feelings on Mexican‐Heritage Youth's Mental Health and Risky Behaviors (2011, background): “Strains are ‘‘events, environments or processes that may ‘cause stress’ . . . that is [are] perceived or appraised as being either harmful, challenging, or benign’’ (Hooper, 2007a, p. 327).”
• Parentification and mental health symptoms: mediator effects of perceived unfairness and differentiation of self (2013, background): “Persistent experiences of injustice may not only be traumatic (Cicchetti, 2004; Hooper, 2007a; Hooper et al., 2008; Widom, 1999) and therefore potentially deleterious but, if linked to rumination and unforgiveness, could have additional detrimental consequences.”