Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning
By Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, Jiawei Han. arXiv.org, 2025
1,234 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Efficiently acquiring external knowledge and up-to-date information is essential for effective reasoning and text generation in large language models (LLMs). Prompting advanced LLMs with reasoning capabilities to use search engines during inference is often suboptimal, as the LLM might not fully possess the capability on how to interact optimally with the search engine. This paper introduces Search-R1, an extension of reinforcement learning (RL) for reasoning frameworks where the LLM learns to autonomously generate (multiple) search queries during step-by-step reasoning with real-time retrieval. Search-R1 optimizes LLM reasoning trajectories with multi-turn search interactions, leveraging retrieved token masking for stable RL training and a simple outcome-based reward function. Experiments on seven question-answering datasets show that Search-R1 improves performance by 41% (Qwen2.5-7B) and 20% (Qwen2.5-3B) over various RAG baselines under the same setting. This paper further provides empirical insights into RL optimization methods, LLM choices, and response length dynamics in retrieval-augmented reasoning. The code and model checkpoints are available at https://github.com/PeterGriffinJin/Search-R1.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fcaafeb72142fe3d1a5d698a072d69778d244b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training (2025, positive): “This enables the large-scale RL training and has shown strong results in tasks such as mathematical reasoning [14], search [57, 58], and tool use [59, 60].”
- ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs (2025, neutral): “Tool-integrated reasoning was first introduced to help LLMs solve computationally intensive mathematical problems with the integration of programming strategies [1, 6, 18, 32].”
- Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey (2023, neutral): “This issue primarily stems from biases inherent in the training data and will be amplified by the low-quality information gathered from the web.”
- WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capability (2025, neutral): “Other studies employ reinforcement learning to train reasoning with search capabilities from scratch [22, 44, 2, 67, 45], showing strong results in Wikipedia-based QA.”
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs (2025, positive): “It has shown strong performance in enhancing reasoning abilities across a range of tasks, including mathematical problem solving (Shao et al., 2024; Xie et al., 2025), search engine interaction (Jin et al., 2025; Song et al., 2025), and code generation (Li et al., 2025b).”
- Qwen3-VL Technical Report (2025, positive): “Inspired by the great prior works on "thinking with images" (Wu et al., 2025a; Jin et al., 2025; Zheng et al., 2025; Lai et al., 2025), we endow Qwen3-VL with similar agentic capabilities through a two-stage training paradigm.”
- Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems (2026, unknown): “More specifically, the agent reformulates, decomposes, and iteratively revises the original user query using conversational context before each retrieval step (Jin et al., 2025; Xi et al., 2025).”
- Fix Before Search: Benchmarking Agentic Query Visual Pre-processing in Multimodal Retrieval-augmented Generation (2026, unknown): “Techniques such as query rewriting(Jin et al., 2025; Shi et al., 2025), expansion(Jiang et al., 2025), and decomposition(Xu et al., 2025) are standard components designed to bridge the gap between a user’s raw input and the indexed knowledge.”
- ReasonIR: Training Retrievers for Reasoning Tasks (2025, unknown): “Query decomposition is another test-time technique has been shown to be effective on multi-hop retrieval tasks (Wang et al., 2024; Jin et al., 2025).”
- A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval (2025, unknown): “The commonly used smoothing methods (Zhai and Lafferty, 2004; Zhai et al., 2008) include Jalinek-Mercer smoothing, Dirichlet smoothing, etc.”