Moving Smiles: The Role of Dynamic Components for the Perception of the Genuineness of Smiles

By Eva G. Krumhuber, Arvid Kappas. 2005

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fc6a09dc106d5e5bbbb07da1d3bfaee425e872b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. S. R. Manstead
2. Eva G. Krumhuber
3. Paul Ekman
4. Paul L. Rosin
5. Darren P. Cosker
6. David Marshall
7. Arvid Kappas
8. Fernando De la Torre

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Erik Cambria
2. Soujanya Poria
3. Fernando De la Torre
4. A. S. R. Manstead
5. Jeffrey F. Cohn
6. Louis-philippe Morency
7. Eva G. Krumhuber
8. Amir Hussain

In Sensory Systems

1. A. S. R. Manstead
2. Eva G. Krumhuber
3. Paul Ekman
4. Arvid Kappas
5. Jeffrey F. Cohn

Citations in the corpus

• Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis (2014, background): “For example, the so-called Duchenne smile (a genuine smile indicating pleasure) is characterized by smooth onset, increasing to an apex, and a smooth, relatively lengthy offset [28].”
• Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes (2008, methodology): “…for real persons) provide a useful tool for research in emotion and social interactions (Blascovich, Loomis, Beall, Swinth, Hoyt, & Bailenson, 2002), because they allow full control over the facial expression and its dynamics, e.g. its intensity and temporal course (cf. Krumhuber & Kappas, 2005).”
• The Hourglass of Emotions (2011, background): “For example, the so-called Duchenne smile (a genuine smile indicating pleasure) is characterised by smooth onset, increasing to an apex, and a smooth, relatively lengthy offset [50].”
• Effects of Dynamic Aspects of Facial Expressions: A Review (2013, background): “…durations (i.e., onset, offset) and more irregular onset actions have been found to be associated with judgments of politeness (rather than amusement), and lower genuineness and spontaneity in the case of smile expressions (Ambadar, Cohn, & Reed, 2009; Hess & Kleck, 1994; Krumhuber & Kappas, 2005).”
• Observer-based measurement of facial expression with the Facial Action Coding System. (2007, background): “Timing of facial expressions influences judgments of genuineness among other dimensions (Krumhuber & Kappas, 2005; Schmidt, Ambadar, & Cohn, 2006).”
• Effects of Dynamic Attributes of Smiles in Human and Synthetic Faces: A Simulated Job Interview Setting (2009, methodology): “These findings extend previous evidence for synthetic faces (Krumhuber and Kappas 2005; Krumhuber et al. 2007b), by showing that the temporal parameters of smiles influence not only impressions of the target person but also more consequential decisions.”
• Temporal Aspects of Facial Displays in Person and Expression Perception: The Effects of Smile Dynamics, Head-tilt, and Gender (2007, background): “Furthermore, smiles with long onset durations were judged to be more flirtatious and more authentic, thereby replicating previous findings (Krumhuber & Kappas, 2005).”
• Detecting Happiness: Perceiver Sensitivity to Enjoyment and Non-Enjoyment Smiles (2007, background): “Krumhuber and Kappas (2005) as well as Chartrand and Gosselin (2005; also see”
• Detecting depression from facial actions and vocal prosody (2009, background): “One is the dynamics of facial actions [2, 5-8], which has a powerful influence on person perception [ 9 , 10] and social behavior [11] , The packaging of facial actions and multimodal displays, a concept originally proposed in the infancy literature [12], is an especially exciting development.”