Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments

By R. Burlando, Francesco Guala. 2005

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fb6dccc624671e4be90ab46195866abeb7c1dbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications (2006, background): “Ockenfels (1999), Bardsley and Moffatt (2005), Burlando and Guala (2005), Muller et al. (2005) , Ones and Putterman (forthcoming) and Page, Putterman and Unel (2005) also find evidence for heterogeneous cooperation preferences in related experimental designs.”
Social Learning and Norms in a Public Goods Experiment with Inter-Generational Advice (2006, unknown): “Burlando and Guala (2005) classify subjects as conditional cooperators using the same metric.”
Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people (2005, background): “Hypothesis 4: The average contribution of LOW cooperator groups is the same as in the Sorted N experiment.”
Self-signaling and social-signaling in giving (2015, background): “Experimental studies of player heterogeneity typically find one-fifth to one-third of the population o be “selfish types” (e.g. Fischbacher et al., 2001; Kurzban and Hauser, 2005; Burlando and Guala, 2004).”
The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments (2012, background): “, Fischbacher, et al. (2001), Burlando and Guala (2005), Kurzban and Houser (2005), Chaudhuri and Paichayontvijit (2006), Bardsley and Moffatt (2007), Kocher, et al.”
Paradigmatic Experiments: the Dictator Game (2010, background): “…all models of this kind are “born refuted”: we know for example that unconditional cooperation explains only a minority data in Public Goods games (Burlando and Guala 2005, Gachter and Thoni 2005), and that subjects behave quite differently depending on whether the other players expect them to…”
Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature (2011, methodology): “Burlando and Guala (2005) also test for the robustness of conditional cooperation by having participants take part in four different tasks: (1) the “Strategy Method” used by FGF; (2) the “Decomposed Game Technique” used by Offerman et al. (1996);13 (3) contributions to the public account in a…”