A comparison of four process-based models and a statistical regression model to predict growth of Eucalyptus globulus plantations
By P. Miehle, M. Battaglia, P. Sands, D. Forrester, PM Feikema, Stephen J. Livesley, Jim D. Morris, S. Arndt. 2009
75 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fb62e4900f34a6a2a3fa683b91051a8067c738f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Jerome K. Vanclay
- John A. Kershaw
- Aaron Weiskittel
- D. Hann
- K. Kramer
- J. P. Skovsgaard
- Thomas Rötzer
- Harald Bugmann
In Mechanical Engineering
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jerome K. Vanclay
- John A. Kershaw
- Aaron Weiskittel
- D. Hann
- K. Kramer
- J. P. Skovsgaard
- Thomas Rötzer
- Harald Bugmann
Citations in the corpus
- Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, background): “Other extensive reviews for Europe (Zianis et al., 2005), North America (Ter-Mikaelian and Korzukhin, 1997), and Australia (Eamus et al., 2000; Keith et al., 2000) highlight the vast amount of work completed on this topic.”
- Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment (2011, background): “In addition, there are cases where comparisons of forest models have shown that PBMs perform as well as, or even better than, traditional statistical growth and yield models from a forest management perspective (Fontes et al., 2006; Miehle et al., 2009; Pinjuv et al., 2006).”