Restorative justice: the views of victims and offenders. The third report from the evaluation of three schemes

By J. Shapland, Anne‐Marie Atkinson, Helen V. Atkinson, B. Chapman, J. Dignan, Marie Howes, J. Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, A. Sorsby. 2007

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes (2008, methodology): “68 Another element which militates against targeting the offer of restorative justice on the basis of prior characteristics is the findings on victim and offender satisfaction (Shapland et al., 2007).”
Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence (2013, background): “The restorative justice conferencing interventions tended to explicitly include more than one element of procedural justice (Shapland et al. 2007; Sherman et al. 1998).”
Victim satisfaction with restorative justice (2013, background): “As noted by Van den Bos (1996; Lind and Van den Bos, 2002) in relation to fairness assessment in general, but also by Shapland et al. (2007) and Strang and Sherman (2003) in relation to the assessment of restorative justice in particular, such cognitive and informational preparation is instrumental…”