National Accounts of Well-being: bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet

By Juliet Michaelson, S. Abdallah, Nicola Steuer, Sam Thompson, N. Marks, J. Aked, C. Cordon, R. Potts. 2009

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fa7ac8663dc25d3fd11d86a8b2f101012f1f283

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality (2015, background): “Despite nonmarket production is partially integrated in GDP, such as government's defense, emergency housing and healthcare expenditures, many economic activities are excluded from its measures, such as donations, family unit's production of services, as well as many of the determinants of wellbeing”
Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy (2012, methodology): “Whilst some authors (e.g. Michaelson et al., 2009) advocate using indicators based on all of these approaches in a system of national accounts, others (e.g. Layard, 2009) advocate using a single evaluative indicator like life satisfaction to measure progress.”
Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy (2011, methodology): “Finally, the Purpose in Life subscale of Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scales (Ryff, 1989) includes items relevant to accomplishment and competence (e.g., ‚I enjoy making plans for the future and working to make them a reality‛).”
Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review (2014, background): “Because of the multifaceted nature of well-being (Diener, 2009; Michaelson et al., 2009; Pollard & Lee, 2003; Stiglitz, Sen, & Fitoussi, 2009), in order to acquire deeper and more organized knowledge about the effects of SAR on well-being of the elderly, it is better to categorize them.”