Impacts of Intermittent Renewables on Electricity Generation System Operation

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Demand flexibility versus physical network expansions in distribution grids (2016, background): “…increasing penetration of the intermittent RES, the rising EV market and the fact that distribution grids were not designed to accommodate distributed generation add a lot of stress to the grid (Perez-Arriaga & Battle, 2012), (Cossent, Gomez, & Frias, 2009), (Van der Welle & de Joode, 2011).”
A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of U.S. renewable portfolio standards (2016, background): “…GHG benefits of variable renewables are diminished by, at most, less than 10% (Göransson and Johnsson 2009; Gross et al. 2006; Pehnt et al. 2008; Perez-Arriaga and Batlle 2012), with far lower levels anticipated at smaller penetrations of RE in large electric systems (Fripp 2011; Valentino et…”
Cycling of conventional power plants: technical limits and actual costs (2015, background): “The way of operating conventional power plants is changing as a consequence of the increasing penetration of intermittent renewables in the electricity generation system [1].”
Electricity prices, large-scale renewable integration, and policy implications (2017, background): “See, for example, Pérez-Arriaga and Batlle (2012).”
Balancing power and variable renewables: Three links (2015, background): “One could mandate smoother transitions between dispatch intervals, shorten intervals [120,98], or introduce a dedicated ramping product [87].”