An Empirical Study of Function Clones in Open Source Software

By Chanchal Kumar Roy, James R. Cordy. 2008

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Software, Program Analysis & Verification, Signal Processing, Software Engineering

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Daya Guo
2. Nan Duan
3. Neel Sundaresan
4. Tien Nhut Nguyen
5. Alexey Svyatkovskiy
6. Anh Tuan Nguyen
7. Michele Tufano
8. Colin B. Clement

In Software

1. Neel Sundaresan
2. Alexey Svyatkovskiy
3. Tien Nhut Nguyen
4. Daya Guo
5. Nan Duan
6. Anh Tuan Nguyen
7. Colin B. Clement
8. Shao Kun Deng

In Program Analysis & Verification

1. Ge Li
2. Anh Tuan Nguyen
3. Neel Sundaresan
4. Daya Guo
5. Tien Nhut Nguyen
6. Hoan Anh Nguyen
7. Michele Tufano
8. Nan Duan

In Signal Processing

1. Tien Nhut Nguyen
2. Anh Tuan Nguyen
3. Long Zhou
4. Ge Li
5. Neel Sundaresan
6. Shujie Liu
7. Daya Guo
8. Linjun Shou

Citations in the corpus

• CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation (2021, methodology): “Studies [6, 60] have shown that a software system usually contain 7-23% clone codes.”
• A Large-Scale Study on Repetitiveness, Containment, and Composability of Routines in Open-Source Projects (2016, background): “Roy and Cordy [56] studied on 15 open-source projects and reported that 7.2–15% of code is clones at the function level.”