Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome after Methadone or Buprenorphine Exposure
By H. Jones, K. Kaltenbach, S. Heil, S. Stine, M. Coyle, A. Arria, K. O’grady, P. Selby, Peter R. Martin, G. Fischer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
927 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BACKGROUND Methadone, a full mu-opioid agonist, is the recommended treatment for opioid dependence during pregnancy. However, prenatal exposure to methadone is associated with a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) characterized by central nervous system hyperirritability and autonomic nervous system dysfunction, which often requires medication and extended hospitalization. Buprenorphine, a partial mu-opioid agonist, is an alternative treatment for opioid dependence but has not been extensively studied in pregnancy. METHODS We conducted a double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dosing, randomized, controlled study in which buprenorphine and methadone were compared for use in the comprehensive care of 175 pregnant women with opioid dependency at eight international sites. Primary outcomes were the number of neonates requiring treatment for NAS, the peak NAS score, the total amount of morphine needed to treat NAS, the length of the hospital stay for neonates, and neonatal head circumference. RESULTS Treatment was discontinued by 16 of the 89 women in the methadone group (18%) and 28 of the 86 women in the buprenorphine group (33%). A comparison of the 131 neonates whose mothers were followed to the end of pregnancy according to treatment group (with 58 exposed to buprenorphine and 73 exposed to methadone) showed that the former group required significantly less morphine (mean dose, 1.1 mg vs. 10.4 mg; P<0.0091), had a significantly shorter hospital stay (10.0 days vs. 17.5 days, P<0.0091), and had a significantly shorter duration of treatment for the neonatal abstinence syndrome (4.1 days vs. 9.9 days, P<0.003125) (P values calculated in accordance with prespecified thresholds for significance). There were no significant differences between groups in other primary or secondary outcomes or in the rates of maternal or neonatal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS These results are consistent with the use of buprenorphine as an acceptable treatment for opioid dependence in pregnant women. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00271219.)
Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f843afdfc5ae2632b98821bd363f20667f76528
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew J. Kolodny
- S. Patrick
- C. Hwang
- R. Schumacher
- D. Courtwright
- P. Kreiner
- Brian D. Benneyworth
- J. Eadie
Citations in the corpus
- The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. (2015, positive): “Both buprenorphine and methadone treatment are associated with reduced overdose risk and improved maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy (19, 44, 51, 72).”
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009. (2012, background): “A recent randomized, double-blind trial found that newborns whose mothers were treated with buprenorphine required 89% less morphine and spent 43% less time in the hospital.(38) Possible advantages to buprenorphine include patient-administered dosing, which relieves patients from daily visits to out”
- Neonatal Drug Withdrawal (2012, background): “4 mg) compared with infants born to mothers on methadone maintenance.(48)”