The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services
By Mark Sagoff. 2011
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f7749b3410a784311ed4eb75a4e0c63361ffed2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach (2012, background): “Statements examining the ways in whichmonetising approaches could be employed to incorporate the value of nature into societal decision-making processes but also addressing non-monetary values, such as those developed in the theoretical foundations of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – T”
- Ecosystem services (2011, unknown): “As Sagoff (2011) has argued, the conceptual distance between market-and science-based approaches to constructing and using knowledge is considerable.”
- An inventory of invasive alien species in China (2012, background): “Scientific measurements of impact are valued differently by different stakeholders and the valuation may differ in space and time and from case to case (Sagoff 2011).”
- “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, background): “Sagoff (2011) gives the example of pollination of fruit trees by bees.”
- Where is the value in valuing pollination ecosystem services to agriculture (2015, background): “This is reflected in the fact that there remain few examples whereby the economic benefits of wild pollinators result in farmers implementing pollinator conservation without state subsidies (Ghazoul, 2007; Sagoff, 2011).”
- Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge (2016, methodology): “Along with Leopold, Sagoff [117] stresses the point that most organisms do not have a value for us (at least one that we can assess); however, they still deserve to be protected on ethical and moral grounds (the principles on which we identify as a society).”