Gender ideologies and forms of contentious mobilization in the Middle East

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies (2013, background): “…terrorism, or non-state actors may use nonviolent methods such as demonstrations, boycotts, or non-cooperation campaigns to impose costs or unseat the government.4 We refer to Cunningham (2013) and Asal et al. (2013) for systematic analyses on features affecting nonviolent and violent campaigns.”
Ideology in civil war (2014, background): “Asal et al. (2013) show that ethnopolitical organizations in the Middle East with genderinclusive ideologies were significantly more likely to engage in only nonviolent forms of protest, while those with leftist ideologies were significantly more likely to engage in only violent forms of protest.”
Understanding strategic choice (2013, background): “…of the strategic choice of organizations and measures of lower levels of activity would increase our understanding of why specific organizations pick specific strategies, and when they are likely to use a mixed strategy approach to engage with the state (see Asal et al., 2013 in this issue).”