Design pattern implementation in Java and aspectJ

By Jan Hannemann, Gregor Kiczales. Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, 2002

728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Development, Software

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f4205e63d63f75d40993c5cac8d051888bcfc9d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Gregor Kiczales
2. Mira Mezini
3. Laurie J. Hendren
4. Klaus Ostermann
5. Ondřej Lhoták
6. Premkumar T. Devanbu
7. Monica S. Lam
8. John Whaley

In Development

1. Mira Mezini
2. Klaus Ostermann

In Software

1. Mira Mezini
2. Laurie J. Hendren
3. Klaus Ostermann
4. Ondřej Lhoták

Citations in the corpus

• Aspect-oriented programming and modular reasoning (2005, background): “It has proven popular [15, 23, 26] because it makes it possible for developers to write modular code for concerns such as synchronization [11, 14], error handling [29], persistence [37], certain design patterns [18] etc.”
• Conquering aspects with Caesar (2003, methodology): “This is because the authors [7] recognize the need to separate aspect implementation and aspect binding.”
• Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ (2005, methodology): “[23] Hidehiko Masuhara, Gregor Kiczales, and Chris Dutchyn.”