EFFECTS OF SEA URCHINS (PARECHINUS ANGULOSUS) ON RECRUITS AND JUVENILES OF ABALONE (HALIOTIS MIDAE)

By E. Day, G. Branch. 2002

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f3e62818a58446a8a728007799d48d91f86da29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Ling
2. S. Ibbott
3. Robert Steneck
4. M. Graham
5. J. Estes
6. J. Sanderson
7. R. Scheibling
8. B. Hawkins

In Oceanography

1. S. Ling
2. S. Ibbott
3. Robert Steneck
4. M. Graham
5. J. Estes
6. J. Sanderson
7. R. Scheibling
8. K. Lafferty

Citations in the corpus

• Recovery of canopy-forming macroalgae following removal of the enigmatic grazing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (2010, background): “…(N10 individuals m−2) but have no observable effect on attached macroalgae, with such populations typically exhibiting cryptic foraging behaviour whereby only detached macroalgal material, i.e. ‘drift’ algae, is consumed (e.g. Harrold and Reed, 1985; Dayton et al., 1992; Day and Branch, 2002).”
• Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future (2002, background): “…nearby intertidal food webs through either the capture of fine kelp particles by filter feeders (for example, mussels [Duggins et al. 1989] or clams [Soares et al. 1997]) or large pieces of drift kelp by limpets (Bustamante et al. 1995; Bustamante & Branch 1996) and sea urchins (Day & Branch 2002).”