Against Intellectual Monopoly: Does Intellectual Monopoly Increase Innovation?
By Michele Boldrin, David K. Levine. 2008
593 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f29ea3d32555a56cdc7f1225218bf3be1051894
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Susanne Prantl
- A. Chu
- Natália Barbosa
- Guido Cozzi
- S. Galli
- Ana Paula Neto de Faria
- Tony (Anthony) John Grenville Hey
- Gordon Bell
Citations in the corpus
- Does Intellectual Monopoly Stimulate or Stifle Innovation (2012, methodology): “Given (7) - (9), the amount of monopolistic profit generated by the most”
- Beyond the Data Deluge (2009, methodology): “In 2007, Jim Gray laid out his vision for a fourth research paradigm—data-intensive science— which he described as collaborative, networked, and data-driven (1, 10).”
- Innovation across Europe: how important are institutional differences? (2011, background): “Kanwar, 2007) it provides evidence supporting the arguments against the use of patents (e.g. Horwitz and Lai, 1996; Boldrin and Levine, 2008; Hopenhayn et al., 2006).”
- Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation (2015, background): “Focusing on the product market interventions that are part of the SMP, like we do, Bottasso and Sembenelli (2001) and Badinger (2007) show that the intervention reduced mark-ups in manufacturing industries.”
- What Do We Learn from Schumpeterian Growth Theory (2013, unknown): “18Similarly, in Boldrin and Levine (2008), patenting is detrimental to competition and thereby to innovation for the same reason that competition is good for innovation.”
- Technology Transfer and the Economic Implications of the Strengthening of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries (2008, background): “Boldrin and Levine (2007) recognise the need for innovators to be rewarded and to have the right of sale with regard to their ideas.”