Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care

By M. Ryan, S. Farrar. British medical journal, 2000

980 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f023c684bbb6b6162b38ede86dac10353b7f6fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Catharina G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn
2. A. Brett Hauber
3. John F. P. Bridges
4. Deborah A. Marshall
5. T. Prior
6. Maarten J. IJzerman
7. J. González
8. C. Cunningham

In General Health Professions

1. Deborah A. Marshall

Citations in the corpus

• Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. (2011, methodology): “Conjoint-analysis methods are particularly useful for quantifying preferences for nonmarket goods and services or where market choices are severely constrained by regulatory and institutional factors , such as in health care [14].”
• Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “We then describe the analysis of data from this example using a conditional logit model consistent with the random utility model of choice [35,40,43].”