Kappa and Its Dependence on Marginal Rates
By Richard J. Cook. 2005
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1efebc33538b01c86cd41a19914deb36fb031645
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
- Ronald C. Kessler
- Josep Maria Haro
- Alan M. Zaslavsky
- Murray B. Stein
- N. Sampson
- R. Jin
- S. Heeringa
- J. Lépine
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of classification accuracy using Cohen's Weighted Kappa (2008, unknown): “The interested reader is referred to publications such as Maclure and Willett (1987), Thompson and Walter (1988), Cook (1998) and Cicchetti and Feinstein (1990a, 1990b) for more details.”
- Variance Estimation of Nominal-Scale Inter-Rater Reliability with Random Selection of Raters (2008, unknown): “Another informative overview of the kappa problem was given by Cook (1998) .”
- Composite International Diagnostic Interview screening scales for DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders (2012, background): “Although k is the traditional measure used in psychiatric research, it is not emphasized here because is varies across populations that differ in prevalence even when sensitivity (SN; the percentage of true cases correctly classified) and specificity (SP ; the percentage of true non-cases correctly ”
- Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys (2006, background): “Although κ is the most widely used measure of concordance in validity studies of psychiatric disorders, it has been criticized because it is dependent on prevalence and consequently is often low in situations where there appears to be high agreement between low-prevalence measures (Byrt et al., 1993”
- Clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Screening Scales (CIDI-SC) in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) (2013, background): “cases correctly classified) are constant (Cook, 1998).”