Managing non‐native fish in the environment

By J. Robert Britton, Rodolphe E. Gozlan, G. Copp. 2011

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1efd3efeb3e2c4722d881b8f73332c80c8b53680

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. Lorenzo Vilizzi
2. G. Copp
3. S. Brosse
4. Sébastien Villéger
5. O. Beauchard
6. T. Oberdorff
7. A. Toussaint
8. A. Tarkan

In Ecology

1. Sébastien Villéger
2. S. Brosse
3. T. Oberdorff
4. A. Toussaint
5. Lorenzo Vilizzi
6. O. Beauchard
7. G. Copp
8. A. Tarkan

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Brosse
2. Sébastien Villéger
3. Lorenzo Vilizzi
4. O. Beauchard
5. T. Oberdorff
6. G. Copp
7. A. Toussaint
8. A. Tarkan

Citations in the corpus

• Worldwide freshwater fish homogenization is driven by a few widespread non-native species (2016, methodology): “In most studies on freshwater fish, all non-native species were pooled to compute the changes in alphaand/or beta-diversity (Alcaraz et al. 2005; Blanchet et al. 2010; Gozlan et al. 2010; Britton et al. 2011; Clavero 2011).”
• Experimental Evidence from Causal Criteria Analysis for the Effects of Common Carp Cyprinus carpio on Freshwater Ecosystems: A Global Perspective (2015, background): “The management of carp has therefore become a priority issue in efforts to mitigate the species’ detrimental effects on freshwater ecosystems (Britton et al., 2011b).”