English relative clause constructions

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

English filler-gap constructions (2010, background): “For a proposal factoring out generalizations common to the two types of wh-relative discussed here, see Sag 1997.”
Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence (2006, background): “To calculate the predictions of this metric, Wilson and Carroll’s (1954) original entropy reduction idea is extended to infinite languages.”
Headed relative clauses in generative syntax - Part II (2002, background): “An important modification, proposed in Pollard & Sag (1994, ch. 9) and Sag (1997), was the elimination of traces: the relativization site is the argument slot itself, which gets endowed with the SLASH feature by a lexical rule.”
On building a more effcient grammar by exploiting types (2000, background): “2 While still closely aligned with the variant presented in Chapter 9 of that work, the CSLI implementation contributed to and elaborates on the enriched inventory of syntactic rules motivated in Sag (1997).”
Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis (2012, methodology): “91This feature name is due to Sag et al. (2003). For more detailed, explicit analyses that employ the feature name ‘SLASH’, see Gazdar 1981, Gazdar et al.”