Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation

By Stefano Breschi, Franco Malerba, L. Orsenigo. 2000

1,205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ed95a2a0e8fe02625fa5e11bb2206faa9847e26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems (2020, background): “Sectors differ greatly in terms of technological regimes and consequently in industrial dynamics and the organization of innovative activities (Winter 1984; Malerba and Orsenigo 1997; Breschi et al. 2000).”
Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms (2017, background): “…systems of green innovation has shown (Oltra and Saint Jean, 2009), the knowledge base of the EI regime is quite complex and articulated (Braungart et al., 2007; Winter, 1984; Breschi et al., 2000) and thus apparently more in need of internal STI than DUI-like efforts in order to be built up.”
Employment Protection Legislation, Multinational Firms, and Innovation (2012, background): “Boeri and Jimeno (2005) argue that for large firms (which is what we consider in our empirical application), where monitoring is very difficult, the dominant effect of EPL is that it decreases the probability of economic dismissal and therefore increases the value of employment to the worker and…”
Entrepreneurship and the Process of Firms' Entry, Survival and Growth (2007, neutral): “, 1999a)(20) and with regard to the relative importance of the different determinants of a firm’s foundation (for instance, a progressive innovative aptitude may be dominant in fostering entry in the “science-based sectors,” but not so crucial in traditional manufacturing and low-tech service sector”
Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches (2008, background): “Most of the recent works in this field [100,101,98,102] have focused on sectoral differences in terms of concentration of innovative activity, size of innovative firms, ease of entry in the market, turbulence or stability in the population of innovative firms.”