Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.
By Nada F. Khan, S. Harrison, P. Rose. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010
707 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Health Information Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eb8d76eaa5fc3abcd8fc33df114264e632811d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Carol Coupland
- Julia Hippisley-Cox
- R. Morriss
- P. Dhiman
- A. Arthur
- G. Barton
- J. Robson
- R. Riley
Citations in the corpus
- Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in older people: population based cohort study (2011, result): “We did not specifically validate our outcomes as part of this study. However, reviews of validation studies in other UK primary care databases have shown overall high levels of validity, and we would expect similar levels of validity in QResearch.”
- Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies (2020, neutral): “1 (cid:1) 51, p 0 (cid:1) 51) (Appendix 19), but the risk of incidence was lower in smoking than in no-smoking in prospective cohort studies (RRs 0 (cid:1) 60, 95% CI, 0 (cid:1) 44 (cid”