Turbulent boundary layers and channels at moderate Reynolds numbers

By Javier Jiménez, Sergio Hoyas, Mark P. Simens, Yoshinori Mizuno. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The behaviour of the velocity and pressure fluctuations in the outer layers of wall-bounded turbulent flows is analysed by comparing a new simulation of the zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer with older simulations of channels. The 99 % boundary-layer thickness is used as a reasonable analogue of the channel half-width, but the two flows are found to be too different for the analogy to be complete. In agreement with previous results, it is found that the fluctuations of the transverse velocities and of the pressure are stronger in the boundary layer, and this is traced to the pressure fluctuations induced in the outer intermittent layer by the differences between the potential and rotational flow regions. The same effect is also shown to be responsible for the stronger wake component of the mean velocity profile in external flows, whose increased energy production is the ultimate reason for the stronger fluctuations. Contrary to some previous results by our group, and by others, the streamwise velocity fluctuations are also found to be higher in boundary layers, although the effect is weaker. Within the limitations of the non-parallel nature of the boundary layer, the wall-parallel scales of all the fluctuations are similar in both the flows, suggesting that the scale-selection mechanism resides just below the intermittent region, y/δ = 0.3–0.5. This is also the location of the largest differences in the intensities, although the limited Reynolds number of the boundary-layer simulation (Reθ ≈ 2000) prevents firm conclusions on the scaling of this location. The statistics of the new boundary layer are available from http://torroja.dmt.upm.es/ftp/blayers/.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eb3c0dbcf3e4e6aa510049d2735299cc9dde064

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Ivan Marusic
  2. Nicholas Hutchins
  3. Javier Jiménez
  4. Matteo Bernardini
  5. Sergio Pirozzoli
  6. Philipp Schlatter
  7. B. McKeon
  8. Ramis Örlü

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Ivan Marusic
  2. Nicholas Hutchins
  3. Sergio Pirozzoli
  4. Matteo Bernardini
  5. Javier Jiménez
  6. Philipp Schlatter
  7. B. McKeon
  8. Ramis Örlü

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Ivan Marusic
  2. Nicholas Hutchins
  3. Philipp Schlatter
  4. Ramis Örlü
  5. Javier Jiménez
  6. Sergio Pirozzoli
  7. Matteo Bernardini
  8. B. McKeon

Citations in the corpus